Why Has Business Performance Management Software Defied the Recession With 4% Revenue Growth?

Business Performance Management Software Defiesto survive and thrive in the current downturn.  
Recession with 4% Revenue Growth, But is it a WiseThe long term return on investment of such solutions is
Investment?also hampered by their rigidity. Most organisation wide
4% growth in business performance managementsystems require all relevant data to be collected and
(BPM) software during a downturn is attentioncollated in a single system, in a specified manner, this is
grabbing, but it is made more impressive when youobviously extremely costly. The rigidity of such
consider that, according to Gartner; IT budgets fell bysystems also means that they are prone to requiring
an average of 4.7% during the same period. So why issubstantial extra investments if there are any changes
BPM and business intelligence (BI) such a high priorityto the business' configuration. If the business acquires
investment?another division, or data source, it will all have to be
The obvious explanation for the increased demand formigrated, causing more upheaval and substantially
BPM software is the desire to reduce overall costs.reducing any returns.
Quality BPM software allows decision makers toSo do the limited and uncertain returns of many large
closely monitor all aspects of performance in anBPM solutions justify the substantial outlay at a time
attempt to reduce wastage and improve efficiency;when businesses are so cash poor? Many would
quickly highlighting problem areas and excess capacity.argue that they do not, however that is not to say that
Another possible explanation is the rise in businessthe lucrative benefits cannot be obtained in other, more
reorganisation that accompanies any economiccost effective ways. Smaller BPM software vendors
downturn; as companies seek to centralise theirappear to have provided very effective, but often
efforts in an attempt to reap economies of scale. Inoverlooked, solutions which deliver all the benefits of
order to fully capitalise on the benefits of centralisation,organisation wide business performance management
decision makers recognise the need to invest insolutions without the rigidity and extra costs that come
business performance management systems thatfrom forcing data into a single format or location. Other
enable them to monitor and manage organisations asvendors achieve this by creating Business intelligence
single entities, rather than multiple disparate units.solutions that work with multiple data sources such as
Although worthy BPM software will deliver the aboveODBC, OLEBD, OLAP and CUBE, allowing automatic
benefits, and more, it must be asked whether there iscollation of all historic and current data without the
any real return on investment at the rates charged byneed to manually transfer. This not only reduces time
some vendors. In the past year there have beenand inefficiencies, it also reduces future costs as any
numerous, well documented cases of organisationsnew divisions or data systems can simply be
offering consultants blank cheques to consolidate andconnected to the system in their current form and
implement an organisation wide business performanceinstantly collated and compared with other company
management system. The vastly improved efficiencydata.  The relatively low purchase and implementation
BPM solutions provide mean that even at these verycosts of these kinds of solutions means they do
high rates there is usually still a return of investment inprovide a substantial return on investment in time to
the long term; but they certainly do not offer the quickjustify purchase in today's climate.
wins that resource stretched companies need in order