Failed IT Investments - Consider People Aspects Before Purchase!

"We just invested more than 200,000 Euro into thissystem that requires discipline to enter lots of data is
new IT solution, but we didn't get much in return!" is aoften subject to fail. Here we are talking for instance
typical phrase of our clients. My list of IT projects thatpurchasing modules of ERP system where buyers still
companies invested while failing to achieve plannedcontinue to buy through a paper process, CRM
benefits is getting longer and longer. For manysystems where sales and service teams don't update
companies, promising IT initiatives started with beautifulcustomer events properly, or any kind of Content,
sales presentations which made decision makersDocument or Knowledge Management solutions, that
become excited and hope that the solution will addressdon't contain enough valuable information so that users
many of their problems. But in the end, the ambitiousdon't take efforts to assess the system.
initiatives became a taboo topic within the organizationWhat went wrong in most of these project is that the
because original objectives haven't been met and theuser perspective has been neglected during the
new system is underutilized. After failure employeesplanning phase. Design teams must consider potential
may blame limitations of the system, but if we lookbarriers of people to make use of the system. These
deeper into the reasons for failure we often realize,aspects could be value provided to users, user
that it was the people that made the new system fail.capabilities, time and efforts required to make it work,
Here some examples. A company deployed a mobileand soft factors such as perceived management
solution for their service teams to make their workcontrol and current working style and working culture.
more efficient and reduce fraud through better activityEven the reasoning that this solution is being used
tracking. The system even could track the location ofsuccessfully by your competitor, doesn't necessarily
the service teams. During the deployment stage, themean that it's good for you. Success strongly depends
company experienced lots of mobile devices beingon the actual people using the system.
destroyed "accidentally". People probably didn't feelTherefore, before you even buy a solution, put
comfortable about being tracked and some eventuallyyourself in the shoes of the future users of the
feared to lose 'under the table' income streams. Othersystem. Certainly, the sales presentation of the
examples, frequently seen, are sophisticated Businesssoftware vendor will appear to be very compelling to
Intelligence and Reporting solutions. In some cases, theyou, but would your users think the same? Do they
data quality was so poor that users rejected the newhave the time, skills, motivation to learn and use such
system from day one. In other cases, the system wassystem? You may even want to involve users into the
either very user unfriendly or left a lot of room fordecision process to get a better idea of change
data misinterpretation.management risks of implementing such solutions.
Again, rejection of the system by users. The mostIT systems can add a lot of value to companies if
common problem with this kind of systems isthey are planned out well for your specific
however, that users don't know how to analyze andorganizational environment and brought to users
interpret the provided information for better decisionthrough the appropriate amount of change
making. If you'd talk to users of existing Businessmanagement. Do the extra efforts of considering the
Intelligence solutions, you would probably find out thatpeople aspects of technology solutions. It may save
many reports are rarely used, and in some cases, theyou lots of money and avoid disappointments about
system is often not utilized at all. Furthermore, anyineffective investments.