of Robert Kaplan and David Advantages and disadvantages Pros Idiots

Advantages/Disadvantages

The approach forwards many positive points. It encourages in particular the managers with better understanding the multiple aspects of the performance. The financial indicators are thus counterbalanced with the directed indicators customer, process and dynamics of growth. It is not a question to support in addition to measurement a type of performance to the detriment of the other axes.

The integration of the dynamic prospect for growth is also one of the strong points of the method.

One will be able however to reproach the method the exclusiveness in the approach Top .
Concretely, implantation of in the firms with tendency to ratify the pyramidal hierarchical structures. For much to firms little related to the men and the organisational crop, the implementations of rather approaches the installation of new tools for wide control that to genuine measuring instruments of the performance.

S I one wishes to remain in the logic of the designers, he is good to remember that in the beginning is intended for the head offices. To decline near the operational managements is already less simple than it appears. As for deploying it near the greatest number, the bet is lost in advance.
So despite everything one makes a point of benefitting from the framing of , it will be to facilitate the development of the operational strategy. For the continuation of the project, the methods of the type, centered on decision making itself, are definitely preferable. Method , the book

Pros & Idiots

Advantages/Disadvantages

Pros & Idiots